| |
















|
SSRC goes on the air…
…And will again, with two
grants
NEWS YOU SHOULD USE
Abandoned waste requirements
A/C PCBs
Fee restrictions
Mercury management
SEMASS housekeeping
Black gold
Mattresses
Board gets the needle
at Duxbury luncheon
SEMASS hosts meeting, tour
HHP attendance down
2005 SSRC HHP Collection
Schedule
LOCAL
Marshfield rethinks trash
system
Holbrook Implements PAYT
Whitman Committee to look at PAYT
Hull curbside within reach, not
grasp
Meet Rosemary Nolan, our new
“MAC”
STATE
SW
Master Plan being revisited
Carron re-files E-Waste Producer
Responsibility bill
Renewable Portfolio Standard
Recycling Hits the Silver
Screen
Home Composting on PBS
EVENTS
|
Our
area’s rising trash tonnage and stagnating recycling rates mirror
nationwide trends. The SSRC and others are going public with the
message that how we manage our waste affects our budgets, our health
and our environment. |
|
SSRC goes on the air…
If you tuned in to WATD 95.9 fm or WJDA 1300 am during the two weeks
in mid-November, you may have heard Holbrook Selectman Jeff Lowe
extolling the virtues of recycling and the SSRC. With matching
funds from American Ref-Fuel at SEMASS, the two stations
played his five-one minute ads 68 times during those weeks. SSRC
Chairman Merle Brown, Vice Chairman Steve Herrmann and
Executive Director Claire Sullivan also got to talk trash at
the mike during on-air interviews with WATD’s Recycling Queen Liz
Raven and WJDA morning host Joe Catalano.
Our five ads, in print on our website, explain the
benefits and convenience of recycling at home, the South Shore
Business Recycling Partnership, how to manage mercury, computer and
cell phone recycling, and dead battery management. The ED
distributed CD recordings of the ads at the December Board meeting,
suggesting that they be played at transfer stations as recommended
by Duxbury reps last month. Copies are still available. |
 |
|
…And will again, with
two grants
The SSRC will broadcast a bigger and better round of radio and print
ads in time for Earth Day in April. The Board requested a $7,400
Municipal Recycling Grant for a “media blitz” from DEP in the
fall, and was awarded $2,400 of it, plus 60 hours of Technical
Assistance from Rosemary Nolan. The scope remains to be negotiated,
but the amount granted would cover at least 42-one minute ads on the
south shore’s powerful WPLM 99.1 fm.
Some of the ads will again feature information about
the hazards and proper disposal of mercury products, so much of the
blitz will be funded with unspent money from SEMASS’ 2004 Material
Separation Plan. This grant money will likely be used to fund over
100 minutes of ads and on-air interviews on WATD and WJDA, and
concurrent print ads in all the local Mariners and Express
newspapers. . . .more Recycling on the Air
at
the end of the News |
|
Abandoned waste requirements
Most towns find themselves in possession of chemical “gifts” that
residents leave at the gate when nobody is looking. These abandoned
wastes become both a liability and health and safety risk to
municipal staff, most commonly
DPW workers. Proper
storage and management is a fairly simple matter, and can help a
town avoid EPA fines, DEP Notices of Noncompliance, property damage
and worker’s compensation claims.
The ED reviewed proper management
practices, and gave out signs and a summary of storage requirements
for abandoned hazardous waste at the November Board meeting (call if
you need a copy). She recommended that sticky labels be
kept near waste to record dates of accumulation. A
secure storage area must be labeled “Danger: Hazardous
Waste” and include DEP’s 24 hour emergency response number,
888-304-1133.
Incompatible chemicals, such as pool chemicals (oxidizers) and
flammables, should be kept in separate cabinets. Dan
Peters of SEMASS offered to do a training, and pointed out that
DEP is planning more inspections of solid waste facilities.
The ED reminded managers that
Natick was hit
with a $137,000 fine by the EPA for improper storage of
chemicals three years ago, and encouraged towns registered as VSQGs
to deliver abandoned waste to regional HHP collections at
least once a year, preferably twice. Quantities in excess of 55
gallons should be removed directly from the site by a licensed
contractor such as
Clean
Harbors
(800-444-4244), Onyx (508-804-4806),
or Jones Environmental
(800-585-7916). |
A/C PCBs
Towns
that have Freon re-moved from appli-ances on site are
reminded that be-fore scrapping air conditioners, you must ensure
that the PCB capaci-tors are removed. Until they are, the AC is
considered “hazardous waste” with its associated liability.
N |
|
Fee restrictions
The Town
of
Franklin’s solid waste program is under fire for the way it
administers its trash fee. An absentee property owner was unable to
have his trash fee abated, and is suing the town for calling it a
fee when he asserts that it is a tax. At the December Board
meeting, the ED clarified the legal criteria for setting fees, and
advised managers to be prepared to either defend their fee structure
or to modify it if their residents raise the issue.
To be considered a fee, 1) it can only benefit the party
paying the fee, 2) the payer must have the option to decline
the service, and 3) the fees must only cover the cost of
providing the service, and not be used to raise revenue for
other items. Of greatest concern are the use of revenues from trash
fees to pay for municipal building trash, the ability of
property owners to opt out of the fee based system and the
concomitant difficulty of haulers to keep track of who receives
service, and fees for specific items that don’t reflect the
actual cost of their administration, handling and disposal.
Reprints of two Globe West articles on the subject were distributed,
and are available through the ED, along with an updated schedule of
MSW fees assessed by SSRC towns. |
Mercury management
SSRC
solid waste managers were disappointed to learn that MSP Coordinator
Sidi Mateo was leaving SEMASS in December, and her position
“absorbed” by a team of SEMASS staff. At the managers’ request, the
ED sent a letter to SEMASS and DEP expressing our concern for the
future of service to our towns through the MSP. The new MSP Team
Leader, Dan Peters, and supervisor Anthony Dell’Anno,
met with SSRC Vice Chairman Steve Herrmann and the ED to
discuss our expectations from the MSP, and to set up short and long
term program assistance. Our meeting was very productive, and we
have already received a subsidy for three signs for our HHP
events, one which announces the thermometer swap, as well as
substantial funding for our spring media campaign (see page
1). Mr. Peters and the ED are also putting finishing touches on a
brochure promoting town-specific mercury collection
pro-grams, and we will be scheduling mercury trainings for
municipal staff who handle the stuff.
Solid waste managers are reminded to check your Universal
Waste Sheds periodically to ensure that they are only used for
mercury related storage, have functional spill kits, a sign with
emergency phone numbers, and that fluorescent tubes are neatly
contained to minimize breakage.
SEMASS’ latest Material Separation Plan, which covers
7/04-12/06, was released last month for comment, which the ED
provided. Of note is the availability of twelve more Universal
Waste Sheds to towns that don’t have one, or would like an
additional one at a school or municipal building. If interested,
call Dan Peters at
508-295-2860. |
|
Towns that contract
with SEMASS for disposal should check their AMTs, which is a
tonnage allowance. Towns that deliver below 90% of the
AMT may be billed for the unused tonnage, although that has never
happened in practice. Of greater concern is that if a town goes
above 110% of the
AMT, the additional tonnage
can be billed at the market rate, which for Tier 1 towns may be
significantly more than their contract rate. Thus, it is
advisable that all towns with SEMASS contracts request upward
adjustments to their
AMT
each January to account for population growth.
Also, towns should update their appointments to the
Council of SEMASS Communities (COSC). Each town should have a
representative and an alternate. The ED serves as the alternate for
the Town of
Weymouth,
and may also serve in that capacity for other towns. She attends
most of the quarterly meetings. SEMASS will send out written
notification for this if it hasn’t done so already. |
|
In order for our towns to
receive 10¢/gallon of waste oil, the ED signed an agreement
with Cyn Environmental and sent them a list of waste oil
tank locations in the towns that had told her they would use
Cyn. Payments for waste oil collected by Cyn are
retroactive to July. The agreement, which expires April 30,
2005, stipulates that the oil be free of PCBs and gasoline,
with a minimum of 200 gallons. Kerosene, trans-mission
fluid and gear oil are acceptable; brake fluid is not. Call
Al Tucchi at
781-341-5108.
|

 |
Cohasset, Hanover and Kingston have taken up
Miller Recycling’s offer to the SSRC to provide
containers, transportation and processsing of old mattresses
at $14/each. The managers from those towns report excellent
service from Miller. Now that Bourne is surcharging each
mattress at $15, plus tipping and transportation, this is an
offer worth considering. Also, several towns have reported
inconsistencies between the actual number of mattresses sent
to Bourne and the number they are being charged for, so keep
tabs on what you are sending down. Mattresses sent to
Bourne end up at Miller anyway! To get a container from
Miller, contact Mitch Slapik at
800-783-6766 |
|
Board gets the
needle at Duxbury luncheon
At our October meeting, the Duxbury
DPW treated the Board to
lunch at its swank
Senior
Center. Before lunch, we
discussed the appetizing subject of residential sharps and medical
waste disposal, which pose a prickly problem (sorry, couldn’t
resist) to generators, waste handlers and disposal facilities.
Proper disposal of home sharps is a confusing subject. State
agencies instruct users to put needles in a rigid container with
bleach, seal it, label it “not for recycling”, and put it out with
the trash. However, transfer stations, waste haulers, SEMASS and
recycling facilities prohibit this practice, since it poses a
serious health and safety risk to staff, especially if they pop open
in the compactor. Sharps are not collected by doctors or
pharmacies, so the only safe option is for users such as diabetics
to purchase costly mail-back sharps containers. (Go to ssrc.info,
hazardous waste page about mail back options.)
Marc Selman
presented the details of State Contractor Medical Waste Disposal
Company’s sharps collection services. Selman demonstrated
MWDC’s 30 gal., 18”x18”x24” lined box with special lid. The box
holds smaller containers with needles, not loose sharps. The cost
for boxes, including delivery, collection and processing, is
$33.25/box, with a minimum charge of $85. Collected material is
autoclaved twice, then landfilled or incinerated. MWDC can do
scheduled or on call pickups, and can provide boxes and a manned
truck at special collections, i.e. HHP events. The town of
Stoughton
fills 6-12 boxes on HHP days. The SSRC can negotiate a better price
for multiple collections.
The ED proposed that she administer sharps collections at the
regional HHP events. With an estimated cost of $300/collection,
there was the question of who would pay? SSRC subsidy? The Board
said no. Fee for service? Towns HHP budgets? Would pharmacies
sponsor collections? Mr. Herrmann was concerned about residents who
miss the one day collection leaving materials at the gate. Mr.
Selman agreed that it may be more sensible to have a permanent
collection. The ED will look into sponsorships by local pharmacies,
but it would be preferable for pharmacies to collect used sharps
themselves. We’ll revisit this soon.
|
 |
|
SEMASS hosts meeting, tour
Former MSP Coordinator Sidi Mateo hosted breakfast and lunch
at our November Board meeting and a tour of American
Ref-Fuel
at SEMASS, the final resting place for most of our area’s
residential trash. Tom
DeMaio, SEMASS Senior Marketing Manager, discussed future prospects for contract
extensions, noting that there are a wide range of contract end
dates, through 2014. Tier 1 towns are receiving automatic
extensions, and new contracts will have a fixed escalator of about
3%, rather than one based on the
CPI, to make budgeting easier for municipalities. No penalties are
being assessed on towns that deliver less than their Annual Minimum
Tonnage (AMT),
since the plant is at full capacity. He anticipates that the plant
will continue to accept waste indefinitely with proper maintenance.
Ms. Sullivan asked for clarification on the definition of
AMT. It means both minimum and maximum annual tonnage, with the
minimum 10% below the specified volume, and the maximum 10% above.
Practically, it only affects pricing if a Tier 1 town delivers more
than its maximum, at which point for the overage would be billed at
market rate.
Sidi Mateo
announced her December 17 departure from SEMASS. She will start
working at Onyx in January. Engin-eer Dan Peters was
introduced, and will take over her posit-ion. He assured us that
there would be no change in the level of service. Mr. Brown thanked
Sidi for her good ser-vice. Mr. Peters has since met with EBoard
members and has already begun providing assistance (see related
article).
Environmental Manager Matt Sears led a very
informative tour of the facility, which also drew recycling folks
from outside the cooperative thanks to MRIP Coordinator Kathi
Mirza. We learned that:
~
SEMASS has two components: a “fuel”
side where the trash is tipped sent to the boilers, and the
“generator” side, where turbines convert the steam from the boilers
to electricity, which is sent out to the grid.
~
There are three boilers which are powered by the incineration of 1
million tons of trash per year.
~
Each ton of trash burned generates as much electricity as 42 gallons
of oil.
~
The plant generates 600,000 MW/year.
~
45,000 tons of metal is recovered per year, including $100,000 worth
of coins.
~
The ash remaining after incineration is 10-20% of the weight of the
incoming trash.
~
The condensers are cooled by leachate water collected from the ash
landfill on site.
Maximum Achievable Control Technology removes most pollutants from
the emissions before they go out the stack, resulting in much
cleaner emissions that those generated by fossil fuel burning power
plants. |

|
HHP attendance down
SSRC towns hosted ten HHP collections in 2004, and had the
lowest turnout in the SSRC’s six years of existence. Clean
Harbors accepted hazardous products from 1,725 households,
including 104 visiting from other towns, and 25 private paying
customers. In 2002, our biggest year, 3,021 households
delivered toxic trash to the events, including 130 visitors.
2003 saw 2,354 participants. This decline reflects a statewide
trend, which we hope can be attributed to an end to the backlog
of basement cleanouts, greater use of non toxic alternatives
such as latex paint, and better access to municipal waste oil
and paint collections.
Kingston and Duxbury have taken turns hosting
two town events for years, and more towns are successfully
teaming up to do multi-town collections, including Hull
and Cohasset, Hanover and Rockland, and Abington, Holbrook and
Whitman. They get the benefit of the 5% volume discount if they
process over 150 cars, and in the future will be able to share
the cost of a setup fee (which is not in our current contract
through 2006).
Next year’s collections will feature a new HHP
direction sign that replaces the one that was “borrowed” from
the roadside in Abington, plus a sign explaining why latex paint
is not accepted and a mercury thermometer swap sign. All three
were funded by SEMASS through the MSP.
Next year, seven collections are scheduled for
the spring, and six for the fall:
2005 SSRC HHP
COLLECTION SCHEDULE
|
April 9 |
Weymouth
|
Sept. 10 |
Abington at Whitman or Holbrook |
|
April 23 |
Duxbury at
Kingston |
Sept. 17 |
Marshfield |
|
April 30 |
Hanover
|
Sept. 24 |
Norwell |
|
May
7 |
Scituate |
Oct. 1 |
Plymouth |
|
May
14 |
Plymouth |
Oct. 15 |
Weymouth
|
|
May
21 |
Hingham |
Oct. 22 |
Rockland
at Hanover |
|
June 4 |
Cohasset at
Hull |
|
|
|
|
Marshfield rethinks
trash system
Hiring
Recycling Coordinator
Marshfield officials have been analyzing the town’s solid waste
program to determine how to reduce the high volume of trash it
disposes at the Seneca Meadows, NY landfill. Marshfield provides
curbside trash and recycling service to residents and businesses
that pay the fee, which was $310/ year in 2003. Ratepayers are
limited to 6 barrels of nonrecyclable trash/week, and may also bring
their waste to the town’s Transfer Station with a $20 sticker.
Private haulers that brought trash to the TS paid a flat fee for
each load. Otherwise, disposal at the TS was “unlimited” for
ratepayers.
It was discovered that the six barrel limit was often
ignored by both ratepayers and the hauler, and the use of the TS for
disposal was being abused, which helped explain the nearly 1 ton /
capita of trash disposed in Marshfield, about double the area
average. So the DPW started plugging the loopholes. It installed a
scale and is now reassess-sing a $92/ton fee for commercial trash,
which more accurately reflects the cost. The DPW also instituted a
punch card system, which limits disposal at the TS to once a week.
Residents must now purchase a $15 sticker for a Freon appliance
disposal, $10 for other appliances. These measures have reduced the
tonnage of trash sent for disposal by an astonishing 25%. This has
enabled Marshfield to reduce its curbside trash fee from $310/year
to $290.
Further reductions in both tonnage and fees are expected
when a part time recycling coordinator is hired this month to
enforce the ordinance requiring private haulers to include recycling
service in their fee, and the six barrel trash limit at the curb.
The coordinator will also
establish recy-cling education
programs, ensure that the Town complies with State recycling
regulations, and take other action to improve the Town's recycling
rate from 11% to its target of 35% for both businesses and
residents.
Whitman
is also looking for ways to cover or reduce its disposal costs.
Residents now receive curbside service for a flat fee of
$200/household, which pays for about 75% of the $1.1 million
collection and disposal costs. To make the program self-supporting,
Town officials considered several options at a meeting last August,
including the establishment of an Enterprise Fund, raising the flat
fee, passing a mandatory recycling ordinance, subsidizing recycling
through the General Fund, and Pay as You Throw. PAYT received the
greatest support, with reimbursement of up to $17K for
implementation offered by Joseph Lambert of the Mass. DEP.
The Town requested and received a Technical Assistance Grant from
DEP to study the feasibility of PAYT, and Municipal Assistance
Coordinator Kathi Mirza has been assigned to work with a
committee appointed by the BOS to investigate the option. SSRC
Board members Tom Burnett, Michelle Roberts and Al Scoglio
accepted the challenge of contributing their expertise to the
committee. |
Holbrook Implements PAYT
The Town of Holbrook has successfully implemented its Pay As
You Throw program despite an impossibly short planning period
and opposition from both residents and some town leaders.
Forced to make up a $375,000 budget cut voted at the April
Town Meeting, the DPW had to either eliminate curbside
collection of trash and recycling, charge a flat fee to cover
half the trash budget, or charge by the bag to cover the
disposal cost. The cut was roughly equal to the disposal
portion of the trash budget. The time frame was too short to
implement the chosen PAYT program from the start of the fiscal
year though, and Selectman Jeff Lowe,
DPW
Director Tom Cummings and Supervisor Ken Brown
pulled off an amazing feat in getting the program running by
mid-October. A pack of ten- 30 gallon bags costs $21, which has
to cover disposal costs for the entire fiscal year.
After a few weeks of complaints and minor glitches,
compliance is now high, trash volume is down and recycling
participation is soaring. As of 1/3/2005, 110 of the 351
municipalities in MA will have some sort of volume based fee
system (PAYT) for trash in place.
Thanks to the Herculean efforts of community activ-ists
Nancy Kramer, Judeth van Hamm, Sustain-able South
Shore’s Harry Cochran, Community Development Director
Jay Szklut and Town Manager Chris McCabe, the Town of
Hull came several steps closer this year to providing municipal
curbside recy-cling and trash collection than it has been in
decades. In December, residents
of 1 to 3 family households had the opportunity to sign up for
the first quarter of service from April through June for a fee
of $45. Another $1.30 /30 gallon bag would have covered the
cost of disposal, using the Pay as You Throw model. For the
program to be cost effective for residents, 65% of the eligible
4,300 households needed to participate, based on the lowest bid
for town-wide collection from WMI. Unfortunately, the 400who
signed up fell far short of the 2,800 household goal.
Currently, residents are responsible for their own trash,
and have access to the Town’s Recycling Center each Saturday
morning. As a result, several haulers cruise the town’s narrow
streets providing subscription service, and tend not to provide
recycling service.
|
|
Meet
Rosemary
Nolan, our new “MAC”
Hello, and Seasons Greetings to SSRC members from Rosemary Nolan,
the new “MRIP” Coordinator for your area. Although the formal
Municipal Recycling Incentive Program ended almost 2 years ago, and
our title has been changed to Municipal Assis-tance Coordinator,
the DEP continues to fund the regional coordinators. I will work
with municipalities to help them achieve our mutual solid waste
reduction and recycling goals. DEP still offers technical
assistance grants where you can apply for consulting assistance to
plan and implement new initiatives.
I will be working out of the Marsh-field DPW, which
is providing my work-space at 870 Moraine Street, Marshfield 02050.
I will use a cell phone for all calls and that number is
857-204-5134.
The fax is 781-837-7163, and my email is
rnolan@townofmarshfield.org.
Half of my time will be on the road working with municipalities, and
I have been assigned 35 cities/towns to work with (15 of which are
in the SSRC); the rest of my time will be in the office.
I worked for the Quincy DPW for 10 years and have
attended many of the same meetings with you. My responsibilities in
Quincy were solid waste, recycling and environmentally related
issues. At the present time I am setting up my new office and
getting up to speed on issues. If you would like to, please forward
me any upcoming projects or goals that you would like to pursue so
that I can evaluate how I may best be of service to you. I look
forward to meeting with each of you personally this winter so that
we can coordinate our efforts and determine what assistance might be
available for your community. Please feel free to use me as a
resource for your solid waste and recycling needs. Have a great
holiday. |
SW Master Plan being
revisited
Circumstances in solid waste management have changed since the
adoption of the current Beyond 2000 Solid Waste Master Plan (SWMP).
Between 2000 and 2004, recycling and waste reduction rates were
flat, state and local government funding and staffing were cut
substantially, new management capacity is not coming online as
anticipated, and net export for disposal is projected to grow.
Based on these changes, DEP Commissioner Golledge
initiated a process to review and revise the Master Plan so that
it addresses these changes.
The DEP’s Solid Waste Advisory Committee (SWAC)
has been debating what changes it would recommend in an updated
SWMP. DEP has held four SWAC meetings that focused on updating
the SWMP, and is formulating initial proposed recommendations to
present for discus-sion at the January 27 SWAC meeting.
Presentation of draft revisions should take place in March, with
public comment hearings in April and May and the final revised
SWMP planned for release next summer.
Discussions led by DEP Branch Chief John
Fischer have covered whether the current no net
import/export policy is useful or relevant, what the relative
roles of DEP and local government should be in the onerous
process of facility siting, whether to continue the moratorium
on new combustion facilities, and what are the most effective
waste reduction strategies. With participants holding many
different points of view, including local activists,
environmental organizations, municipal waste managers, recycling
and disposal facility managers, these meetings have been very
animated.
On the first point, it was generally agreed that
no net import/export is a good goal to aspire to, but should not
be called a policy, as regulating capacity is not a good role
for DEP to play. More in-state recycling, composting and
disposal capacity is needed, but is very difficult to site due
to limited suitable locations and local opposition. Participants
agreed that educating local officials about the relationship of
facility siting to State solid waste goals would be helpful.
DEP has prioritized several waste streams for
attention based on additional waste reduction potential and
benefits, including:
1.
Commercial organics (especially food waste) and paper/ cardboard
2.
Residential Organics (including leaves, yard waste and food
waste), paper and cardboard
3.
Construction and Demolition Debris: Wood and Gypsum Board
4.
Hazardous Products: Mercury products and pesticides
Suggested waste reduction strategies included
product stewardship initiatives, such as the proposed EWaste
Producer Responsibility bill filed 12/1 (see related article),
continued encouragement of municipal PAYT programs , possibly
including some form of mandatory PAYT legislation , recycling
education, stricter enforcement of the waste bans targeting
commercial waste, and fostering new waste management
technologies.
It will be a challenge for DEP to digest the
comments and find the common ground. But Commissioner Golledge
has stated on several occasions that consensus was not
necessarily his goal in making policy.
|
STATE
|
Carron re-files E-Waste
Producer Responsibility bill
Rep. Mark Carron
refiled a redrafted version of the CRT Takeback bill, HD1960. The
bill is intended to require electronics producers to take financial
responsibility for the end of life management of their products, and
to give them incentive to design for efficient reuse, recycling and
reduced toxicity of their components.
Clean Water Action lobbyist and SSRC Secretary John
McNabb had held a summit meeting about the bill in November to
hash out concerns from various quarters and improve the bill's
content. In addition to Rep. Carron (who was also named the SSRC's
3rd "Environmental Hero" for his work on this issue), Natural
Resources and Agriculture Chairman Rep. William Greene,
Cambridge Mayor Michael Sullivan, Scott Cassell from
Product Stewardship Institute, reps from Dell and Hewlett Packard,
high level players in the EU, Canadian and Maine producer
responsibility laws, local recyclers/ refurbishers including Mel
King and Peter Kopcych, and a few of us municipal people
participated in the discussion.
The bill has of implications at the manufacturing, retail,
municipal, and recycling levels, and a lot of issues were fleshed
out to make the bill more workable. A difference of opinion was
noted between the manufacturers, who want to retain cradle to grave
control over their products, and the recyclers and reusers, who were
concerned about the po-tential elimination of secondary markets due
to the manu-acturers’ reluctance to allow their products to be
reused.
Many details of implementation were added to the bill as a
result of the summit, and others would be left to the manufacturers
and DEP. For more information, contact Kara Reeve at kreeve@cleanwater.org.
|
Renewable Portfolio Standard
In
2003, American Ref-Fuel at SEMASS offered to “share
the wealth” with contract communities if a bill that adds existing
waste-to-energy (WTE) facilities to the Renewable Port-folio
Standard, or RPS, is passed. The bill, which didn’t reach a vote in
last year’s legislative session, was refiled on Dec. 1 by Sen.
Robert O’Leary and Rep. Vincent Pedone. It clarifies the
1997 Electric Utility Restructuring Act, which intended to promote
renewable sources of electricity, by including existing renewable
sources in the Portfolio. Passage would allow electricity
produced at existing WTE facilities, including SEMASS, to be sold to
local utilities at a higher rate through the use of Renewable Energy
Credits. This change would guarantee that WTE facilities remain
competitive with cheaper fossil fuel power suppliers, and offset
municipal disposal costs.
SEMASS and the COSC steering committee negotiated a 50% share
of the net revenue from the sale of Renewable Energy Credits for
contracted cities and towns in 2003 if the bill passes.
The
refiled bill has not yet been assigned a bill number, but the
Council of SEMASS Communities will be supporting it through the
legislative process. COSC also encourages its member community
officials to ask their legislators to support this opportunity for
additional revenue. The bill’s first stop will be the Energy
Committee (617-722-2090).
Waste-to-energy facilities safely process the solid waste for
approximately 131 cities and towns in the Commonwealth, and
represent about 50% of the solid waste disposal capacity in our
state. Waste-to-energy facilities generate 250 megawatts of clean,
renewable electricity. Electricity sales help offset the trash
disposal costs for communities. The sale of renewable credits will
increase the electricity revenue at the plants and help to stabilize
the trash disposals costs for communities. |
|
The ED gives “two thumbs up”
for Massachusetts' first solid waste and recycling educational
video, "Recycle. A little Effort...a Big Difference - Recycling
in
Massachusetts.".
Mass. DEP and the City of Lawrence held a premiere screening of this
12 minute DEP-funded production at the Lawrence Showcase Cinema on
Nov. 30. The capacity crowd included Lawrence Mayor Michael
Sullivan, DEP Commissioner Bob Golledge, legislators,
recycling coordinators and businesses, nonprofit organizations, and
75
Lawrence
students and their teachers. The
slick flick, a brainchild of Lawrence Inspectional Services
Commissioner Caroline Ganley, provides viewers with a
straight-forward look at the problems posed by trash and shows what
to do (and what NOT to do) with the various types of trash and
hazardous waste we all generate. We see why it is important to
follow the recycling, composting and hazardous waste rules in our
communities, and learn about the economic, environmental and public
health benefits of recycling in Massachusetts. There is even a
Spanish version.
While Lawrence is referenced briefly in the video, it is a
very good, generic video that can be used by any municipality that
accepts commingled recyclables. A trailer with town specific
information can also be added.
The video was shown at the December SSRC meeting, and
four copies were given to Board members, who will bring them to
their schools and local cable stations. If you would like a
free copy to broadcast, please contact Ann McGovern at 617-292-5834
or
ann.mcgovern@state.ma.us,
and specify what format you need (VHS or DVD). |
Ask
This Old House, the PBS do-it-yourself TV show, recently taped an
episode on home composting featuring DEP's Ann McGovern as a
guest expert. The program is due to air on February 10.
Check your local PBS listings for show times in your area.
|
EVENTS
F
SSRC MSW Manager/Board Meeting,
Wed., Jan. 12,
rescheduled to Thurs, Jan. 13,
2005, 9 am, Cohasset Town Hall; Claire Sullivan, 508-785-8318,
ssrcclaire@comcast.net
Wed., Feb. 9, 9 am,
location TBA
F
MassRecycle Southeast Municipal Recycling Council,
Thurs., Jan. 20, Complete Recycling Solutions, 1 Fr. DeValles
Bvd., Fall River, Claire Sullivan, 508-785-8318
F
Fostering Sustainable Behavior Workshop,
Mon., Jan. 24, 8:30-4:30, Cape Codder Resort, Hyannis; Waquoit
Bay NERR, 508-457-0495 x108; $40 registration includes lunch
F
DEP Solid Waste Advisory Committee,
Thurs., Jan. 27, 1 Winter St. 2nd floor, Boston
F
SWANA Technical Session,
Thurs., Feb. 3, Taunton Holiday Inn
F
“This Old House”
Home Composting episode featuring DEP’s Ann McGovern, February
10 on PBS, check local listings for time
“1. To promote sustainable management of waste,
reducing the impacts of waste management on human health and the
environment” -International Solid Waste Ass’n Rome 2004
Manifesto |
|
I wish
you all a happy and sustainable New Year! -Claire |
|